Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stijn Slump vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Slump vs Dancu analysis and find out who is favored!
Stijn Slump vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Slump has won 51.95% of points on his second serve, while Dancu has won 49.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Slump, in recent form, has won 52.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dancu has won 47.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.18% and 35.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Slump has saved 63.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dancu has saved 61.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Slump has won 65% of matches played (W/L 52/ 28), with Dancu winning 59.21% (W/L 45/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Slump has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 72/ 45), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 17/ 16). Dancu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 172/ 112), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Slump has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.82% of matches (W/L 52/ 27), where as Dancu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.72% of matches (W/L 43/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Slump winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Slump winning 2 and Dancu winning 1. The last match between Slump and Dancu was at the M15 Antalya, 28-03-2024, Second, Clay with Stijn Slump getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Slump and Dancu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Slump winning 1 times and Dancu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Slump winning 0, and Dancu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Slump has played against opponents with an average rank of 60.26 while Dancu has played against players with an average rank of 167.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Slump has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dancu has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Slump has converted 49.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dancu has converted 48.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Slump 1 - 0 Dancu
753
Rank
753
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
503
Rank
503
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
59% (89-62)
Career Total W/L
59% (182-127)
71% (27-11)
YTD W/L
52% (13-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Stijn Slump | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:41:0 | 2:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (57/99) | 52% (46/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (36/57) | 72% (33/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (23/42) | 50% (21/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (34/88) | 40% (40/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Stijn Slump
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stijn Slump | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (27/11) | 52% (13/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (60/30) | 48% (32/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (477/352) | 50% (333/327) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (22/8) | 52% (13/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 109 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 98 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:26 | 2:9:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 27.87 | 158.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1104/2030) | 57% (1210/2120) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (773/1104) | 66% (798/1210) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (486/926) | 49% (449/910) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (107/216) | 49% (88/178) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (845/2001) | 41% (809/1973) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (27/11) | 52% (13/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (27/38) | 52% (13/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (8/14) | 63% (10/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (28/22) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (28/6) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (10/5) | 44% (16/7) |
Stijn Slump Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Stijn Slump
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
49
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
32%
(
24 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
6
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
38%
(
23 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Deney Wassermann
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Stijn Slump
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
48 of
102)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Jiri Barnat
35%
(
19 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marcel Zielinski
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Stijn Slump
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Vlad Andrei Dancu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
52%
(
59 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Vuk Radjenovic
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
81)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Peter Hampe
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
62 of
90)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 6-7(4) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Drazen Petrovic
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
4-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Francesco Cano
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
85)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Slump Vs Dancu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
